The memo from Lonnie G. Bunch III, the first African American to lead the Smithsonian Institution, was as much a message of reassurance as a call to vigilance.

Following targeting what he labeled 鈥渁nti-American ideology鈥 in cultural institutions, Bunch acknowledged the growing uncertainty and laid out a path forward.

 鈥淲e remain steadfast in our mission to bring history, science, education, research, and the arts to all Americans,鈥 he wrote to staff. 鈥淲e will continue to showcase world-class exhibits, collections, and objects, rooted in expertise and accuracy.鈥

Trump鈥檚 order casts a long shadow over the Smithsonian, which, while not a federal agency, is a trust instrumentality of the U.S. government and operates under the guidance of a Board of Regents, including the Chief Justice, Vice President, and members of Congress. The order directs Vice President J.D. Vance, an ex-officio regent, to work with the board on content oversight 鈥 an unprecedented move that has left many within the institution and across the Black community alarmed.

The National Museum of African American History and Culture (NMAAHC), opened in 2016 under Bunch鈥檚 leadership, was directly criticized in the executive order. Its mission to unearth and share America鈥檚 untold Black history, once praised as groundbreaking, is now being reframed by Trump as an example of what he sees as divisive, anti-patriotic content.

Bunch鈥檚 memo doubled down on the Smithsonian鈥檚 long-standing commitment to truth, transparency, and historical scholarship. 

鈥淎s an Institution, our commitment to scholarship and research is unwavering and will always serve as the guiding light for our content,鈥 he stated.

鈥淔or more than 175 years, the Smithsonian has been an educational institution devoted to continuous learning with the public in mind and driven by our most important mission 鈥 the increase and diffusion of knowledge,鈥 Bunch added. 鈥淲e remain committed to telling the multi-faceted stories of this country鈥檚 extraordinary heritage.鈥

That commitment is under direct threat, Black scholars argue.

, education expert Dr. Jerry W. Washington called the order part of 鈥渢he fight over American memory,鈥 a political war that has increasingly targeted race-based historical narratives. 

鈥淥ver months of discussing cultural memory wars, the removal of DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) content, and the nuances of racial dialogue, I鈥檝e seen this gap widen,鈥 Washington wrote. 鈥淚t highlights a fundamental divergence not just in policy preference, but in how we interpret history, power, and truth itself.鈥

Washington and others see the executive order as an extension of Trump鈥檚 2020 directive banning diversity training in federal agencies 鈥 an action that set the stage for a conservative backlash against critical race theory (CRT) and racial equity initiatives.

鈥淐RT became a catch-all term 鈥 a manufactured villain used to silence any acknowledgment of systemic racism, white privilege, or the real struggles of marginalized communities,鈥 Washington noted. 鈥淚t was never about theory. It was about control.鈥

That control has since expanded. Dozens of states have enacted vague educational gag orders aimed at stifling classroom conversations about race and history. DEI programs have been dismantled across colleges and public institutions. 

Now, with the Smithsonian鈥攖he keeper of the nation鈥檚 collective memory 鈥 under the microscope, Black historians and curators fear a broader erasure.

鈥淭he campaign effectively poisoned the well,鈥 Washington wrote. 鈥淢aking any substantive discussion of systemic racism politically toxic.鈥

For many Black Americans, the concern is deeper than academic. It鈥檚 personal. The Smithsonian鈥檚 inclusive storytelling 鈥 exemplified by the NMAAHC 鈥 has provided generations with a long-denied mirror to see themselves in the American narrative. To have that narrative constrained or rewritten at the behest of political power is to have identity and truth under siege.

鈥淎s we have done throughout our history,鈥 Bunch wrote, 鈥渢he Smithsonian will work with the Board of Regents, including the Chief Justice, Vice President, and our congressional and citizen Regents.鈥 

But he made clear that the Smithsonian鈥檚 compass remains unchanged: 鈥淭he board understands and appreciates the Institution鈥檚 mission, as well as the importance of scholarship, expertise, and service to the American public.鈥

Still, the fight over who gets to define America鈥檚 story is far from over.

鈥淭he consequences are real,鈥 Washington warned. 鈥淭his is about more than exhibits. It鈥檚 about erasing the truths that make America whole.鈥

Stacy M. Brown is a senior writer for The 番茄社区app and the senior national correspondent for the Black Press of America. Stacy has more than 25 years of journalism experience and has authored...

Join the Conversation

1 Comment

  1. Great article even though it leaves me very worried about the future of the NMAAHC.
    Can you help me identify the source of the comment, paraphrased, “Come and visit the museum as it may be the last time you see it in its current state.” The context is tied to VP Vance’s new responsibilities for oversight and restructuring in the interest of telling a “truthful” American story.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *